VIRTUAL TRY-ON · SIZE RECOMMENDATION · ONE WIDGET

Fewer returns. Higher conversion.

Shopper photograph before virtual try-on
Shopper photograph after virtual try-on
Interactive comparison between the original shopper photograph and the FittingMe.ai virtual try-on result.
PILOT PARTNER In pilot with Sarenza, a European footwear retailer.
THE COST OF GETTING SIZE WRONG

Returns are not a fulfilment problem.
They're a P&L problem.

Every season, the same loop: the shopper hesitates, orders two sizes, keeps one, sends one back. Reverse logistics, restocking and write-downs stay on your ledger.

~70%
of online carts are abandoned, on average.
— Baymard Institute, 70.22% average
~1 in 4
garments bought online are returned worldwide; the EU rate is higher.
— ~26% global apparel return rate (aggregated Statista data)
Costly
every return carries pick-up, inspection, repackaging and write-down costs.
— Material and category-dependent; scoped per pilot
THE SOLUTION

One widget.
The two answers that decide the purchase.

Most sizing tools answer half the question. The widget answers both: “how does it look on me?” and “which size do I order?”

FEATURE A
Model wearing a bone linen set after virtual try-on
Render · 1.6s
Linen Set · Bone · M

Virtual try-on, on a real photograph.

The shopper uploads one photograph. The garment is rendered on their silhouette — not an avatar. Drape, length and proportion, judged right on the product page.

On-device pre-processing · image handling scoped before launch
FEATURE B
XS
18%
S
42%
M
91%
L
36%
XL
12%

Size recommendation, cross-referenced.

Your size chart, cross-referenced with the garment's cut. Each recommendation carries a fit score and a fallback size for in-between shoppers.

Per-SKU calibration · works with your existing chart
THE DIFFERENTIATOR

It's a single, unified widget.

One input flow, one UI, one measurement plan. One snippet to integrate, one component to evaluate.

See it live →
ROI CALCULATOR

What does fewer returns
do to your P&L?

Three sliders: your orders, your return rate, the share of returns avoided. Every assumption is validated against your own logistics during the pilot.

25,000
25%
27.5%
Your inputs never leave your browser.
Indicative estimate — actual results depend on your catalogue, traffic and the pilot measurement plan.
BENCHMARK SCENARIOS

Benchmark
scenarios.

Ranges published by the industry — not FittingMe.ai promises. The pilot measures your numbers, on your catalogue.

up to −40%
fit-related return rate
True Fit · up to 40% fewer fit-related returns (vendor disclosure)
Higher
conversion rate on product pages with the widget
True Fit · 1–2% sitewide conversion lift (vendor disclosure)
≈ 4 months
median payback period
Internal modelling · scenario only

Sources cited as published by the vendors.

CAPABILITY COMPARISON

Where the unified widget differs.

You've probably evaluated a sizing tool before. Here's what has changed since.

Capability comparison between FittingMe.ai and classic sizing tools
Capability FittingMe.ai Classic sizing tools
Try-on rendered on shopper's own photograph Native Avatar or model only
Size recommendation cross-referenced with brand chart Per-SKU Generic grade
Single, unified widget on product page One snippet Two vendors, two integrations
Image retention terms Scoped by deployment Varies
A/B test instrumentation Pilot dashboard Self-serve at extra cost
Integration scope Pilot-scoped Varies by architecture
  • Try-on rendered on shopper's own photograph
    FittingMe.ai Native
    Classic sizing tools Avatar or model only
  • Size recommendation cross-referenced with brand chart
    FittingMe.ai Per-SKU
    Classic sizing tools Generic grade
  • Single, unified widget on product page
    FittingMe.ai One snippet
    Classic sizing tools Two vendors, two integrations
  • Image retention terms
    FittingMe.ai Scoped by deployment
    Classic sizing tools Varies
  • A/B test instrumentation
    FittingMe.ai Pilot dashboard
    Classic sizing tools Self-serve at extra cost
  • Integration scope
    FittingMe.ai Pilot-scoped
    Classic sizing tools Varies by architecture
HOW IT WORKS

Three steps from snippet to signal.

01

Integrate

One <script> tag in your product-page template, configured against your product data, size charts and consent flow.

02

Shopper input

A photograph plus the usual size. The widget renders the garment on the shopper's silhouette and returns a recommended size with a fit score.

03

Measure

Conversion, return rate and revenue per visitor, tracked A/B against the agreed measurement plan.

TECHNICAL INTEGRATION

One snippet. The platforms you already run on.

Asynchronous loading, product-page-scoped pilots. Details are validated against your platform and catalogue data before launch.

pdp.template.html
<!-- 1 · An anchor where the widget mounts -->
<div id="fittingme-widget-container"></div>

<!-- 2 · One script tag — it builds the widget iframe -->
<script
  src="https://cdn.fittingme.ai/fittingme-widget/loader/fittingme-loader.min.js"
  data-container="#fittingme-widget-container"
  data-api-url="https://api.fittingme.ai"
  data-api-key="YOUR_PUBLISHABLE_KEY"
  data-locale="fr"
  data-product-id="YOUR_PRODUCT_SKU"
  data-brand-slug="your-brand"
  data-garment-type="dresses"
  data-gender="female"
></script>
PLATFORM FIT
S
Shopify
W
WooCommerce
P
PrestaShop
M
Magento
SC
Salesforce CC
⟨/⟩
Custom React / Vue
Open the live widget →
OBJECTIONS, ANSWERED

What buyers ask before signing.

How does this support GDPR review?
Roles, data categories, consent, subprocessors and deletion are mapped during compliance review. The signed agreement and DPA set the binding terms.
Are shopper photos retained after the try-on?
The pilot keeps image handling to the minimum needed. Retention, deletion and telemetry are agreed in writing before launch.
How long does integration actually take?
It depends on your platform and product-page template — scoped during the demo. Simple pilots stay lightweight; custom architectures take more planning.
Does the widget work with our existing size chart?
Yes. The pilot runs on the chart and product data you already maintain; the mapping is verified during onboarding.
What does the pilot look like?
A defined product-page cohort, a measurement plan, technical prerequisites and commercial terms agreed before launch.
Who is behind FittingMe.ai?
A product team based in Paris, focused on try-on and sizing for fashion retailers. References and documentation are shared during vendor review.
BOOK THE WALKTHROUGH

See the widget on
your own product page.

A 30-minute call: one representative product page, your integration constraints, the measurement assumptions. You leave with the next steps.

No credit card. No SDK required for demo. Calls run in EN or FR.